Are Agile and Scrum causing burnout in HR Transformation projects?
- HED
- Mar 24
- 2 min read
Agile and Scrum are often considered essential methods for boosting efficiency, collaboration, and flexibility. In many HR Transformation projects, however the incorrect use of these methods can lead to problems like burnout, higher costs, and more bureaucracy.

Agile and Scrum in large, complex projects are often not sustainable in their current form.
Instead of providing simplicity, these methods can create confusion. Roles and responsibilities become unclear, and tasks often multiply unnecessarily. This leads to increased complexity, diverting attention from the primary objectives of the project.
The Cost of Mixed Methodologies
Teams frequently get lost in the process, which results in frustration and burnout. Many times, Agile and Scrum mixed with Waterfall, add layers of bureaucracy and slow things down.
Who is leading the project?
In projects that involve multiple roles like Project Managers, Scrum Masters, and Agile Coaches, the leadership structure can sometimes become unclear, and creates leadership dynamics.
In a well-organized project, however, all these roles and activities should collaborate effectively, and the Project Manager is typically the one who leads the project’s overall success.
Project Manager must have clear decision-making authority, accountability, and support from senior leadership to truly lead the project
Agile and Scrum can definitely work
Incorporating Agile and Scrum into large digital HR transformation projects can add flexibility, faster adjustments, and improved collaboration while maintaining the structure and predictability of Waterfall.
Agile is ideal for areas requiring quick feedback and iteration, while Waterfall is best suited for well-defined phases. This hybrid approach ensures efficiency and adaptability to evolving business needs.
Success relies on clear planning, transparent communication, and a balanced integration of both methodologies.
Success lies in clear planning, transparent communication, and a balanced integration of both methodologies.
Comments